July 17, 2007
Filed Under (Site Features) by admin

Special Thanks to the MDJ for this story!

SOUTH COBB - Cobb commissioners next Tuesday will vote on whether to approve an estimated $38.8 million connector between Windy Hill and Macland Roads in a heavily trafficked area of southwest Cobb.

Government officials and residents have voiced support for the project’s preferred alternative, construction for which would begin in 2010 if approved by commissioners.

“It’s an extremely logical thing to do,” Ward 2 Marietta City Councilman Grif Chalfant said of the connector, which would come within two miles of city limits. “I think it’ll divert your Macland Road, Powder Springs Street (traffic) and ease the congestion through Marietta.”

In November, the majority of the Marietta City Council supported Chalfant’s plan to examine the Macland Connector as an alternative to the Powder Springs Connector, which Atlanta Regional Commission officials told Mayor Bill Dunaway could not be fast-tracked due to a $4.4 billion federal funding shortfall.

“As far as I’m concerned, (Powder Springs Connector) is dead,” Chalfant said.

The Powder Springs Connector would have linked Powder Springs Street and South Cobb Drive for Paulding and Cobb commuters, whereas the Cobb project would connect Macland Road to Windy Hill Road with a two-lane limited-access rural roadway. The preferred route, “2B,” includes a proposed tunnel under Callaway Road to limit impact on Jim Miller Park to the north.

According to Chalfant, the Powder Springs Connector also would have exacerbated problems with people cutting through the Whitlock Heights neighborhood in Marietta.

“It would’ve given people a good reason to cross there to get to South Cobb Drive,” Chalfant said.

According to county officials, the 2005 1-cent Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax will fund design, right-of-way acquisition and construction of the Macland Connector.

Marietta resident Craig Kootsillas, in a letter to the Marietta Daily Journal published July 9, expressed concern for shortfalls in federal funds for the project and other SPLOST-funded projects, but called the Windy Hill and Macland roads connector “critical for congestion relief.”

Opposition, he wrote, “Centers on the fact that the majority of cars destined to use the new roadways are not residents of the area,” but come from the fast-growing areas of west Cobb and Paulding, for instance.

“The local opposition ignores the impossibility of building a fence around the district or imposing a toll on ‘foreigners.’ Simply put, the cars are coming,” Kootsillas wrote. “Instead of wishing them away, local community leaders ought to understand that inaction will lead to regional gridlock.”

At a June 26 commission meeting, Cobb resident Diane Martin also spoke on behalf of a committee in support of the project’s preferred alternative, noting that right-of-way acquisition of 59 modular and mobile homes in Cumberland Creek and Lamplighter Village poses the least relative impact.

“As you are aware, these residential right-of-way acquisitions will not displace owners of homes valued around $750,000 as they are in east Cobb, but rather homeowners whose property range from about $65,000 to $200,000,” she said.

Cobb Chairman Sam Olens said the project has been on the table for at least 25 years.

“There is a huge problem with congestion in the area,” Olens said. “I would certainly prefer to move forward with a project if it demonstrates effective improvements.”

Olens and Chalfant each said there is no panacea to ease growing traffic problems in the area.

The connector, however, may come close.

The Cobb Department of Transportation projects that in 2012, average daily traffic on Powder Springs Road - presently 40,000 - would climb to 44,850 without the connector and fall to 32,000 cars a day with the project.

For Callaway Road, which has an average daily traffic 15,900, the 2012 numbers are 17,800 without the connector and 12,050 with the new road.

According to Cobb DOT Director David Montanye, the project solves a bottleneck problem caused by two eastbound lanes on both Powder Springs and Macland roads that merge into two eastbound lanes.

“You have four lanes of traffic bottleneck into two lanes,” he said, noting morning traffic from commuters working their way east to Interstate 75 increases congestion.

The extremely important project, he said, would connect the gap between Windy Hill and Macland roads.

Southwest Cobb Commissioner Annette Kesting’s district contains the project, which also borders northwest Cobb Commissioner Helen Goreham’s district.

At a June 14 Public Information Open House, Mrs. Kesting said she didn’t see the project as a solution to the bottleneck problem, but said she plans to listen to what her constituents want.


Comments:
6 Comments posted on "Windy Hill - Macland Road Connector?"
steve bakatsas on July 19th, 2007 at 9:30 am #

I would like to see a proposed map of the new road to tell about traffic ease. Those numbers are opinions and not reality. I am in civil engineering so I know about paper vs. reality.


steve bakatsas on July 19th, 2007 at 9:39 am #

I would have liked to seen a simple but effective connection between Chestnut Hill Road and Manning Road. That would have been very cheap to build and very effective. The politics in Marietta are overwhelming and it’s a republican town. Most white people here are closed minded and ignorant. I don’t believe that would have ever happened. They will continue to use Hickory Drive and Kirkpatrick as a cut thru at 50 mph in a neighborhood. Go Marietta!! Dicks!!


White Person on July 19th, 2007 at 10:26 pm #

“Most white people here are closed minded and ignorant.”

Wow. Way to make a broad generalization there buddy. Not really sure what your point is in stating that opinion….

Most people who think that most white people here are closed minded and ignorant are closed minded and ignorant.


marietta260 on September 6th, 2007 at 9:09 am #

Steve is a very unhappy man. I am guessing that he is also uneducated, but obviously ignorant. You had a good point to start off with re the Chestnut Hill and Manning Rd idea, but then it all just kind of fell apart there at the end. I suppose that’s why others are running this city and not you.


steve bakatsas on November 14th, 2007 at 6:09 am #

I am mad at the dictator type ways these people and this county arrogantly operate and toss their authoritive weight around (both government and civilians) that always cause even more problems in the end. Control freaks everywhere! We have no respect for the trees or land use, with money being the sole leader in building permits making one hell of a sea of angry faces. This is one of the worst places in the country for rude drivers. We are like rats in a small cage. What happened to the southern hospitality and courteous people? I suppose they all moved away sometime in the mid 90’s. Marietta was a great city in 1985. What happened?


Lucas on May 8th, 2008 at 1:41 pm #

I live in a subdivision near where the projected connector will be built. I will not be affected negatively, only positively, as the connector will ease traffic on Callaway, which I use to access my neighborhood. My subdivision backs up to the Lamplighter Village Mobile home park. My neighbors have said that the county plans to raze all of Lamplighter, to build a park, with the connector running through the center of it. Does anyone know if this is true, because I sure would love a beautiful park backing up to my property!


Post a comment
Name: 
Email: 
URL: 
Comments: